Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below - The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Return of the Gold Standard Imminent

January 28, 2012


gold.jpg

The gold standard will precipitate a massive deflation. The ensuing chaos will help usher in their coveted New World Order and World Currency.







by Anthony Migchels
(henrymakow.com)

What has been in the cards for decades is now fully on the agenda: the return of the Gold Standard. Gold as currency is a weapon. It is a wealth transfer to those holding Gold, which is not the 99%, and will precipitate a massive deflation. The ensuing chaos will help usher in their coveted New World Order and World Currency.

The number of stories pertaining Gold as currency has seen a major peak recently. This week alone it was reported that India will pay Iran in Gold for their oil imports. In another development, China, Japan, Russia, France and a number of Arab states will pay each other with a basket of currencies, including Gold.

Yet another story was Robert Zoellick, who has been promoting a Gold Standard for years, 'admitting' the demise of the dollar reflects 'a changing balance of power' in the world.

These stories are framed as resistance against the dollar hegemony and of course that is a part of the story. Another dialectic, US against the Rest of the World.

But were these Nations really acting independently, they would barter amongst each other, based on current account bookkeeping and basically crossing off all mutually outstanding debt. That would save them massive sums of currency and associated capital costs. They would need 'hard currency' only to settle negative balances.

Of course, when these developments run their course it could have a devastating effect on the dollar, as it would mean trillions of dollars would be repatriated from overseas as they are no longer used to finance international trade.

It helps the Money Power in her plan to bring the US down a few notches, indispensable in her drive to World Government.

But the loss of the importance of the dollar is only part of the story. Because the dollar is only the current vehicle the Money Power uses to rule international finance. It doesn't care for the vehicle itself, as long as it has a suitable successor and The next will be Gold.

And in the US itself there also is a strong drive towards Gold as currency. The onslaught by Austrian Economics in the Alternative Media comes to mind. And Ron Paul of course. He openly calls for Gold as currency. In this respect he clearly is the ultimate internationalist candidate. This contrasts sharply with his patriotic 'constitutionalism'. But when he must chose between constitution and the monetary, it is clear what his priorities are. Ron Paul lies about 'contitutional money', saying the constitution says we should have Gold as currency. But it doesn't, it says we may have Gold as currency. But other units are also allowed.

This 'little detail' is really very telling. It is typical of Money Power change agent. They hide behind a sympathetic and credible theme, meanwhile sabotaging or actually actively supporting the implementation of a worse and more important agenda.

And control of the money supply is all important. To the Money Power, anyway.

It also reminds us of how internationally the Money Power operates. We must not allow our national priorities to obscure the international context.

Austerity and Deflation

A Gold Standard would be an unmitigated disaster. It will lead to an excruciating deflation. Deflation is a horror for debtors, who see their debts and the interest they pay over them grow worse in real terms. And since everybody is complaining of debt so much, we might reconsider making it worse with deflation.

Winston Churchill, who was involved in the reinstatement of the Gold Standard in Britain in the twenties testified to the House of Commons in 1935, when the deflation of the Great Depression had made Gold untenable:

"Look at the enormously increased volume of commodities which have to be created in order to pay off the same mortgage debt or loan. Minor fluctuation might well be ignored, but I say quite seriously that this monetary convulsion has now reached a pitch where I am persuaded that the producers of new wealth will not tolerate indefinitely so hideous an oppression. . . . I therefore point to this evil, and to the search for the method's of remedying it as the first, second and third of all the problems which should command and rivet our thoughts."

Deflation destroys the economy, because people have an incentive to hoard cash, instead of using it for production and consumption.

The Banking Fraternity is well aware of the disastrous deflation that Gold promotes. For instance, the Protocols say in their financial program (Protocol 20): 'You are aware that the gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.'

This quote also confirms that they are able, willing and known to withhold vast amounts of Gold from the market. So the idea that Gold is a safe bet because 'it cannot be printed' does not stand: the volume can be manipulated, because most of it is in the hand of the Money Power, who can inflate and deflate at will.

The social and economic havoc it created through the Great Depression led to the rise of fascism. It is quite likely that weaponized Gold is being used for similar purposes this time.

And of course we should also consider the one off wealth transfer that reinstating Gold as currency brings: it's price would have to go up maybe 10 or 20 fold to replace all the fiat currency in the world. The 99% having no Gold will as usually be holding the bag.

Conclusion

Far from a 'solution', the coming Gold Standard is the logical next step in the Money Power plan of destabilization and order out of chaos. We will have a long and painful depression and although it is not certain that Gold will completely replace paper, it is obvious that we will know scarce money and contraction for years to come. The austerity and deflation that the Money Power's agents in the IMF, Bank of International Settlements and (Central) Banks are promoting will set the stage for major upheaval and the usual problem-reaction-solution, dialectically driven march to World Government.

Our answer must be to have the Government reclaim the monopoly it has surrendered to a private Central Banking Cartel. But the goal is not to 'end the Fed'. The goal is better money.

Government must print debt free money, preferably Social Credit. Since this is not going to happen any time soon, we should build free market currencies, which can actively compete with national currencies. Ellen Brown's Public Banking is another approach in the Populist spirit.

And we should take our money out the banks of course. Why would we patronize a business that is enslaving us with credit by bookkeeping, slapping interest on it, creating booms and busts and trillions of bail outs?




You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/return_of_the_gold_standard_im.html
Articles >>

Below - Philo - "Every Good Man is Free" (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged

January 27, 2012

Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear bombs in the sea and the Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in cameras installed by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illuminati diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by James Farganne in the spirit of free discussion. 




camera.jpg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

When we compare the  6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.

A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.

The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.

It sent a 30-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges, houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, because there was no earthquake. They were taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.

What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?

The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by it.

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.

Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.

But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube.  Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.

Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.

The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been another cause.

blast door.jpgReactors Destroyed by Nukes

It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant personnel.

Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was destroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an utter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.

Israeli Involvement

In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.

All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.

Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth

What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?

Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.

Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.

The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the tsunami's aftermath.

Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.

Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.

Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.

I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.

No one has debunked him yet.

His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.

Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?

Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?

Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.

If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the alternative media's silence on it.

To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed the truth.

--

The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ




 


You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
Articles >>

Comments for "The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged "

Ken Adachi said (January 28, 2012):

Hello Henry,

Jim Stone did not break the Japan nuke story when he published his article for the first time on May 28, 2011 claiming that the March 11 Japan Tsunami was caused by undersea nuclear explosions. Nor did he break the story on May 28, 2011 that the Fukushima, Daaiichi reactor containment building explosions were caused by planted nuclear devices (rather than an
explosion of hydrogen gas).

I broke both of those stories fully TEN WEEKS earlier, BEFORE we ever read a word from Mr. Jim Stone, ex-NASA analyst.

I published an article on March 12, 2011, ONE day after the Japan event, Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? (Mar. 12, 2011)

From Ken Adachi, Editor
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanquakemanufactured12mar11.shtml
March 12, 2011

in which I said:

1. The tsunami was not a genuine, earthquake-provoked tsunami, but rather was a sea SURGE that resulted from planted undersea nuclear devices.

2. The Daiichi explosions were due to mini nukes that were planted inside the Fukushima facility in order to CREATE the APPEARANCE of a massive nuclear leak (as in Chernobyl) in order to perpetrate a Radiation psyops HOAX upon the world. The purpose was to turn public opinion against nuclear power plants in favor of the "safer" gas turbine plants that Merkle's Germany announced a few months ago would now become the norm in Germany as they phase out nuclear plants (does this sound like a setup to you? Think there's any connection to that natural gas pipeline that Russia wants to run from the Caspian sea across Afghanistan, etc?)

3. i reported on March 12, 2011 that the March 11, 2011 Japan seismographs were NOT showing a natural earthquake release, but rather the sudden vertical spike that can ONLY be seen with underground nuclear explosions, not natural earthquake activity.

4. I also reported that the radiation being detected in the sea water was not coming from Daiichi, but rather was due to the undersea nuclear explosion that created the sea surge that was erroneously reported to be a tsunami caused my a Richter 9 earthquake.

All these claims were made on March 12, 2011 at educate-yoursef.org.
I re-posted Jim Stone's May 28 article on my web site on June 1, 2011 . I was somewhat miffed that he did not mention my web site or my March 12 article in his piece, but I felt the story was too important to ignore as he CORROBORATED and affirmed what I had already stated 2.5 months earlier.

No one ever heard of (or read anything by) "freelance reporter" Jim Stone before he "broke" the Japan nuke/faux earthquake story with his May 28, 2011 article. Now that I know of his NASA affiliation, I have greater suspicions as to WHY he didn't mention my web site or my March 12 article in his write up.

Richard said (January 27, 2012):

Also, Kudos to you on the current Fukashima article on your site. I have long felt that there is something extremely fishy about that event.


The article you posted is the first I have read of the
"exploded-by-design" theory. Of course, I am sure the criminals that did this will get away with it, just as they did on 9/11.


Thank-you for the work that you do!

Below- Edith Starr Miller - Murdered for Exposing Conspiracy (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Philo: "Every Good Man is Free"

January 26, 2012


philo.jpeg
"You can't feel good without being good."  We spend our lives trying to skirt this truth.

Philo of Alexandria, a contemporary of Christ, reminds us that freedom is a spiritual state. A reader, Al Thompson, reviews Philo's inspiring essay, "Every Good Man is Free."  









by Al Thompson
(henrymakow.com)

"....Every wicked man is a slave, and that proposition I fully established by many natural and unquestionable arguments;"   "......we will proceed to show that every virtuous man is free."

     Anyone who offends God in any way is indeed a slave.  He is in bondage to Satan or evil and there is no way a man can please God while breaking any of His commandments. 

Philo (20 BCE - 50 CE), known also as Philo of Alexandria  was a Hellenistic Jewish Biblical philosopher born in Alexandria.  His work was important for several Christian Church Fathers but has been ignored by Judaism.


"...God is my ruler, and no mortal man....."
"For, in real truth, that man alone is free who has God for his leader;..."
 
     Ultimately, this is the only viable condition for any man, woman, or child.  Because man-made laws are too inconsistent, too capricious, and too convoluted to be of any practical use. 

God's natural laws are very easy to understand because they are self-evident.  By taking other men out of the equation, the true relationship between God and man is direct and profound.  There is no middleman because it isn't needed. 

The goal should be the acquisition of virtue and good character.  These things can be acquired by keeping within the natural law of God's creation.  And that is all for which most people are responsible.  We don't need any religious nonsense to satisfy God.  What we need is to build good character within ourselves in order to defeat the evil.  Evil is weak and ineffective, and there is no good thing that can come from it.  And people who are engaged in evil are then slaves to it.  There's a reason why it is called bondage.

"But the virtuous man has absolutely no obstacle at all since he rises up against, and resists, and overthrows, and tramples on fear, and cowardice, and pain, and all things of that kind, as if they were rivals defeated by him in the public games.  For he has learned to disregard all the commands which those most unlawful masters of the soul seek to impose upon him."

Notice the use of the words "unlawful masters."  Can we not apply them to our religious and political leaders?  All politicians and religious leaders I am aware of are chronic liars and only use God's laws if it suits their agenda. 

"But the virtuous man does do everything wisely; therefore he alone is free.  And indeed the man whom it is not possible either to compel to do anything, or to prevent from doing anything, cannot possibly be a slave; and one cannot compel or prevent the virtuous man."

This is a very important point.  A wise man cannot be compelled to do anything that he doesn't want to do.  A virtuous man cannot be corrupted.  And I think that if more men and women made it a point to avoid their evil inclinations it would make their lives--and those around them-- a lot more pleasant.

No matter what the situation, the virtuous man will always have the upper hand in everything because he is setting his foundation upon natural law that is in turn established by the God who created us.

"..Slavery, then, is of two kinds; slavery of the soul and slavery of the body.  Now, of our bodies, men are masters; but over our souls, wickedness and the passions have the dominion.  And we may speak of freedom in the same manner.  For one kind of freedom gives fearlessness of body in respect of any dangers which can come upon it from men of still more powerful body; while the other produces peace to the mind, by putting a check upon the authority of the passions."

Evil and passions have a way of putting us into a type of stupor where we do evil things and can't seem to control it.  By exercising a little self-control, any man can separate himself from evil and build up his character by obeying God's commandments.   

Religions seem to blur the common sense that God established under natural law.  When I conduct my behavior in line with God's commandments, I seem to have  more inner peace and I don't have a lot of bad things happening to me. 

As I look back on my life,  bad things happened due to my disobedience to God's law.  Having said that, I am not a religious man, and I don't practice any religious rituals because they always have the potential to lead me into idolatry.

 I just leave all religious rituals alone as they are too dangerous to use.  I don't go to any churches or religious functions  because there is simply too much idolatry. 

Goodness and virtue are things that every man, woman, or child should be pursuing rather than digging themselves deeper and deeper into the hole of evil. 

In addition, there is no sense in studying evil people and evil events.  They are what they are and it is destructive to the mind to keep studying things that are stupid; nothing smart comes from it. 

Sure, you need to know the basics, but after that, there's no sense in viewing it over and over again.  Keeping the mind continually focused on the goal of becoming a good man or woman should be of the highest priority.

---

An unabridged version of this article can be found here.

A copy of  Every Good Man is Free click here.


Walter Allen Thompson is the author of Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments and is a former businessman, income tax activist, who has recently spent over 5 years at a federally-funded sabbatical in a gated community. His website is http://www.graceofrepentance.com

You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/every_good_man_is_free_a_revie.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Philo: "Every Good Man is Free""

Robert said (January 27, 2012):

It is not helpful to talk about 'God's commandments' without saying what these are. For example, from the Old
Testament we have such gems as 'God' commanding: "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy
all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and
sheep, camels and donkeys.” Is involvement in such activity consistent with 'feeling good'?

--

Thanks Robert,

Al was referring to an inner sense of natural law, not to the OT

h

Mark said (January 27, 2012):

'"You can't feel good without being good." We spend our loves trying to skirt this truth.'

Waking up to the reality of what's really going on in society, that is after a long traverse down a rabbit hole that reveals a hideos truth, one realises that without telling the truth one is, as you say, totally lost.

Those brave souls who have done this, who are riding the rolercoaster of unquestionable truth know that upon seeing what is going on, they simply can't stand by and do nothing. They have to get involved. 'Evil prevails while good men do nothing' so it is said and so true are those words.

A favourite modern day philosopher, the late John 'The Birdman' Bryant wrote:

"The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them -- except force."

How true are those words?

If we are in a boat and there's a hole in the bottom, it's our duty to repair it or else we sink. It is obvious, therefore, that we should do the same upon seeing the ever growing hole within our reality.

One thing that we as a people have lost is the ability to complain. No one ever does anymore. Worse still, liberal slur words are created to stop our natural ability to attack that which seeks to attack us. The word skeptic is a prime example to shut down anyone who wishes to pass on vital information to our overall well being. Worse still, those people are attacked by the very people they are trying to help, people who have been conditioned to protect the system that enslaves them.

Honesty is always the best policy. It's a policy I've lived to all my life regardless of the consequences and they have been grim, greatly affecting my life in due process.

It is high time that all stood up to be counted, not as an individual group but as a group of individuals, knowing what must be done and doing it. Knowing and promoting the truth is an incredibly hard thing to do in a society that is built on falsehoods. After all, Orwell wrote:

'In time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.'

My Morning in Female Court

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 21, 2012


femalejudge.jpeg

My Morning in Female Court


A reader feels a gender bias against men in an increasingly female-dominated judiciary. Of course, he is delusional since only women, homosexuals, select minorities and Jews can be discriminated against, and he is none of these.  











by Daniel
(henrymakow.com)

Today I spent my morning sitting in a court room patiently waiting my turn to plead not guilty and present my evidence in a case of speeding and photo radar.

The Judge was stuffy and fierce, she almost seemed to be aging at an accelerated pace.

The crown prosecutor was young and slender, just the right amount of curves in the right places... O.k. she was hot! There !.

I had the luxury of sitting through the entire mornings proceedings and getting to hear all the cases and arguments before me.  Most of these were half-assed pleas for mercy to avoid shelling out a few bucks and hey why not?

A few of the defendant's didn't  have a clue what was up or down; no case no arguments prepared. Even the cops in the back row were chuckling to themselves.

Watching the judge through all the proceedings, she seemed dead and lifeless but actively engaged in taking notes.

legallyblond.jpegThe crown prosecutor was a little more lively I think I almost caught her smiling a few times!

Now, I actually had a case based on solid facts, nothing to do with my opinion.

I finally get my turn to present my case and defend myself. I constructed my defense based on a portion their own evidence. I used the photographs, reported speed, lapsed time stamp and measurement of the vehicle to prove the car was actually going much slower then reported.

I made very nice diagrams and a written explanation for the Judge. The case I thought was nearly bullet proof but she made no attempt to look at any of the contrary evidence. The cute little crown attorney came at me with the speed of a viper (I must be onto something here I thought)

"ARE YOU A MATHEMATICIAN!!" she barked, "Did you make those calculations yourself?"

 Yes I replied, here is a copy for you. She went on to tell me that I am not qualified to do that. She never looked at the evidence nor did the judge. She just grimaced at me the whole time and I didn't see her making any notes. I was quickly found guilty.

Now can anyone please correct me but I thought the court house is a place where the judge carefully reviews facts and evidence?

Did I think too much? Maybe that combined with my gender intimidated them?

-
I have since spoken to the guy who runs www.wiseupwinnipeg.com and he has informed me that what I thought was "court" really isn't. My case was heard by a magistrate. They make you think its court. He went on to tell me that at that level you could have the most iron clad defense and they'll still convict you: "its almost criminal" in his words.

I was also informed that my defense has been used before and its nearly indisputable; you just don't hear about it in the media. He was kind enough to provide me with all the details on how to appeal and have it heard by an actual judge.


50,000 Feminists Take Umbrage at Pink Legos

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 18, 2012

pinklogos.png

50,000 Feminists Take Umbrage at Pink Legos


You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males.









by Jon Harrison
(henrymakow.com)

I'm a little bit conflicted on this, because I know stirring controversy is exactly what they want to draw attention to their "cause". This sort of thing should probably just be ignored, but they've gotten on a nationally syndicated radio show. The presentation was particularly objectionable. It was taken for granted that  feminist theory is proven and academically sound.

A consumer product targeted at children is so unsafe and dangerous  that an organized campaign to have it be banned from the marketplace had arisen with growing support.

What was it this time? Tainted Chinese baby formula. Choking hazard happy meal toys? Collapsible asphyxiation strollers? According to the presenter, this was a far more sinister menace.

Pink Legos. The snappable building block toy enjoyed by generations of children.  So what's the big deal? As it turns out, when viewed through feminist prism lenses any girl who is exposed to (let alone plays with) this toy will become a wife and mother, someone who is feminine and forfeits  her chance to be a brain surgeon or win a Nobel prize in astrophysics.

Lest you think this is a hoax, the original petition (with 47,000+ signatures & counting) can be found at "Tell Lego to Stop Selling Out Girls."

All interested parties who want to support women's right to choose the color of her daughters Lego's are invited to sign my counter-petition.

You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males. Oops, have I just committed a sexist "gender stereotype"? 




Israel Is Named After Satanist's Son

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 10, 2012



320.jpgIsrael is Named after Satanist's Son

Barry Chamish's book (left) documents how the Illuminati (Zionism and Communism) both originate in a 17th century Satanic Jewish cult.



by Clifford Shack
(henrymakow.com)

The State of Israel, the military outpost created by the satanic Shabbatean-Frankist Rothschilds, was named after their great-great-great grandfather, Israel who happened to be the first-born son of Shabbatai Tzvi (1616-1676.)

They were able to get away with this naming for obvious reasons. Now, Israel ben Shabbatai was named after the grandson of the patriarch Abraham so...it should still have some meaning to y'all nevertheless,right? How do I know this you may ask? It becomes obvious when you realize that Shabbatean-Frankists are not Jewish.

For goodness sake, they pulled off the Holocaust! Understanding this, and knowing that Shabbatai Tzvi's son, ground-zero of the Shabbatean-Frankist breeding program, was named Israel...and that from him came the illustrious Rothschild clan...it's simple math.

Still don't buy it? look at my article about the second President of the state of Israel, from 1952-1963, Yitzak Ben Zvi. It's called "Father of the State of Israel."

http://cliffordshack-article-archive-storage.blogspot.com/2012/01/for-whom-is-state-of-israel-named.html

Are the Illuminati a Sabbatean Frankist breeding Program?

--

John comments:

Henry, the write up by Clifford Shack concerning the name 'Israel' is deceitful and outrageous.The name 'Israel' was given by Yahweh after fighting with Jacob all night.


Josh comments:

Israel is the name Jacob received in the Bible.  Hence his sons, the 12 tribes, were referred to as Israel. While you may or may not believe the Bible story,  it is completely moronic to suggest that the country was named after some 'satanist jew' named Israel (a somewhat popular name for Jews prior to the formation of a modern country by that name).

Max Comments:


Surely, the other commentators are correct that Israel (Ysra'el in Hebrew) is the name given to Jacob because he actually had "striven with God" as indicated by its literal meaning.

However, this word may also have ambiguity and I think that Clifford Shack has perhaps drawn our attention to its "occult meaning" that most people are unaware of: "Israel" can also be a "blended" word from IS(is) - RA - EL(lil) containing the names of three pagan gods/goddesses.  Isis is the Egyptian throne goddess; Ra is the Egyptian sun god; and Ellil (also referred to as Enril in the Sumerian-Babylonian time) is the Akkadian god of earth and wind.

Isn't that quite the Rothschild's way of deception?  No wonder why Satanists like twisted words.